Zakir Naik moves High Court against the revocation of his passport

Zakir Naik moves High Court against the revocation of his passport

The controversial Islamic preacher Islamic preacher Zakir Naik has approached the Bombay high court challenging the cancellation of his passport by the external affairs ministry, claiming he had been targeted because of his religion.

His passport has been revoked after he repeatedly failed to appear before the National Investigation Agency (NIA) and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in connection with alleged terror-funding cases.

In his petition, filed by his lawyer, the 51-year-old televangelist claimed he had never incited communal disharmony or any illegal activity against any specific religion or community and that he had always condemned those who incited violence and terrorised people.

He claimed the investigating agencies were targeting him only because he’s a Muslim and that his lectures were “distorted and doctored to implicate him in false and frivolous cases.”
The Mumbai-based controversial preacher fled India after he was accused of influencing terrorists involved in terror strike in Dhaka on July 1, 2016.

He was accused of spreading hatred through his provocative speeches, funding terrorists and laundering several crores of rupees over the years.

Naik claimed the official stand of the Bangladesh government was that the seven attackers were all members of the Jamaat-ul-Mujahideen, Bangladesh, a terrorist organisation.

The charges about them being his followers were the creation of local newspaper, which was to a large extent blindly followed by the Indian media, he said.

In his petition, Naik claimed that he had founded the IRF in 1991 primarily for philanthropic works such as empowering Muslim women and to help needy Muslim youth. He claimed to have started various scholarships to fund education of poor and needy Muslim youth.

Apart from challenging the revocation of his passport, the controversial Islamic preacher also pleaded to the court to direct the investigating agencies to submit reports, along with evidence, to the court on the charges levelled against him.

According to reports, Naik took refuge in Malaysia after obtaining permanent residency there.

In his petition, the 51-year-old televangelist claimed he has never incited communal disharmony or any illegal activity against any specific religion or community and he has always condemned those who incited violence and terrorised people. He claimed the investigating agencies were targeting him only because of his religion – for being a Muslim and “his lectures are distorted and doctored to implicate him in false and frivolous cases.”