Latest NewsNEWSIndia

The controversial verdict of Supreme Court on living together without marriage

The Supreme Court legalized that, an adult couple has a right to live together without marriage. The top court held that live-in relationships were now even recognized by the legislature and they had found a place under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

The observations came while the apex court was hearing a plea filed by one Nandakumar against a Kerala High Court order annulling his marriage with Thushara on the ground that he had not attained the legal age of marriage.

Nandakumar, who had approached the top court, will turn 21 on May 30 this year. The high court had also granted the custody of Thushara to her father after noting that she was not Nandakumar’s “lawfully wedded” wife.

A bench of justices AK Sikri and Ashok Bhushan said their marriage could not say to be “null and void” merely because Nandakumar was less than 21 years of age at the time of marriage.

Read More: ward attendant rapes a woman who went hospital after being beaten by husband

“Appellant no 1, as well as Thushara, are Hindus. Such a marriage is not a void marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and as per the provisions of section 12, which can be attracted in such a case, at the most, the marriage would be avoidable marriage… “

“It is sufficient to note that both appellant no 1 and Thushara are major. Even if they were not competent to enter into wedlock (which position itself is disputed), they have right to live together even outside wedlock,” the bench said.

While setting aside the order of the high court granting custody of woman to her father, the apex court said that “we make it clear that the freedom of choice would be of Thushara as to with whom she wants to live”.

shortlink

Post Your Comments


Back to top button