The Supreme Court is delivering its verdict on whether its 1994 judgment, holding that mosque was not essential for offering namaz, be examined by a constitutional bench. Justice Bhushan is reading out the judgement, Here are the excerpts.
- Ayodhya case will not be referred to a larger bench
- Ayodhya Title suit will be heard in next one month.
- Justice Bhushan: “Need to see context”
- Earlier finding that mosque is integral to Islam was made in context of land acquisition: Justice Bhushan
- 1994 order must be treated as observation.
- All religions have to be respected equally by the State. Constitution bench judgement was confined to acquisition of land: Justice Bhushan
- All religions have to be respected equally by the State. Constitution bench judgement was confined to acquisition of land: Justice Bhushan
- Justice Nazeer disagrees with other two judges- CJI Mishra and Judge Bhushan.
- Mosque must be considered by a larger judge, says Nazeer.
Justice SA Nazeer has penned down a separate judgement which is expected to be read out soon.
We will keep you posted with more updates as soon as we get it.
Post Your Comments